<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor Libertarians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philipklein.com/2006/01/poor-libertarians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philipklein.com/2006/01/poor-libertarians/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.philipklein.com/2006/01/poor-libertarians/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philipklein.com/?p=887#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think libertarianism is irrelevant for the foreseeable future. As an inflexible ideology it was little more than a luxury of an era of peace and prosperity. It&#039;s leadership was never exactly organized in any significant way, and especially now it&#039;s become an isolationist party at a time when isolationism is only thriving on the opposite end of the spectrum. Meanwhile, it&#039;s impossible for someone who is serious about national defense to associate themselves with the term.

The only future I see for libertarians is perhaps as an interest group, focusing on issues like eminent domain, or a network of local (and maybe state) parties.

Otherwise, I see a major political realignment coming in the next few years - the most dramatic since the 1850s.  The Democratic party is on course to implode and fragment (or, Whig-out, if you will) - if not before &#039;08, definitely in the aftermath of that election.

At which point it&#039;ll be interesting to see where the various factions land, but regardless, I see a version of the Republican party emerging that will be much more hospitable to all but the most hardwired libertarians.  Now, this may happen slowly, as the old religious-right element dies off, and you see a new, more tolerant, generation of Christian conservatives come of age.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think libertarianism is irrelevant for the foreseeable future. As an inflexible ideology it was little more than a luxury of an era of peace and prosperity. It&#8217;s leadership was never exactly organized in any significant way, and especially now it&#8217;s become an isolationist party at a time when isolationism is only thriving on the opposite end of the spectrum. Meanwhile, it&#8217;s impossible for someone who is serious about national defense to associate themselves with the term.</p>
<p>The only future I see for libertarians is perhaps as an interest group, focusing on issues like eminent domain, or a network of local (and maybe state) parties.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I see a major political realignment coming in the next few years &#8211; the most dramatic since the 1850s.  The Democratic party is on course to implode and fragment (or, Whig-out, if you will) &#8211; if not before &#8217;08, definitely in the aftermath of that election.</p>
<p>At which point it&#8217;ll be interesting to see where the various factions land, but regardless, I see a version of the Republican party emerging that will be much more hospitable to all but the most hardwired libertarians.  Now, this may happen slowly, as the old religious-right element dies off, and you see a new, more tolerant, generation of Christian conservatives come of age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

